NIOSH releases software for coal mine rescue assessment

Original article published by Safety+Health
escape-scenarios.jpg
Photo: NIOSH

Washington — A new software training module from NIOSH is intended to assist mine operators, miners and industry stakeholders with emergency decision-making during coal mine rescues.

The module presents seven scenarios based on previous events at underground coal mines. Each includes general information about the mine, as well as maps and background information.

Instructors who guide participants through scenarios can stop during key points to present four potential actions that escaping miners might choose. Participants are asked to assess and rate each option and then compare their responses with feedback from emergency response experts and the factual details of each event.

“Sometimes it is clear what miners should or should not do for safe and effective self-escape,” NIOSH says. “However, there are times when even subject matter experts disagree about specific actions. The emergency decision-making training provides participants a place to practice making decisions when dealing with difficult circumstances.”

Under Title 30 CFR Part 49.50, mine rescue teams must meet these criteria:

  • Be available at all times when miners are underground, staying within one-hour ground travel time from the mine rescue station to the mine
  • Consist of five members and one alternate, except when alternative compliance is permitted
  • Have experience working in underground coal mines
  • Inspect, test and maintain appropriate rescue equipment after receiving it
  • Maintain physical fitness
  • Complete initial training

McCraren Compliance offers many opportunities in safety training to help circumvent accidents. Please take a moment to visit our calendar of classes to see what we can do to help your safety measures from training to consulting.

Development Mining Near Wells

First published by MSHA

Nationwide, thousands of oil and gas wells penetrate coal seams that are being actively mined.  An inadvertent intersection with one of these wells could pose a hazard to nearby miners, through the following types of interactions:

  • If a mine inadvertently intersects an active gas well, methane gas can inundate the mining section.
  • Abandoned wells in depleted oil and gas reservoirs can pose similar hazards because they may recharge with gas over time.
  • Flooded and abandoned wells can cause injuries by forcibly ejecting material into the mine or by inundating the mining sections with water.

In recent decades, much has changed in both the mining and gas industries.  Today’s coal mines are deeper, and the proliferation of high-pressure Marcellus and Utica gas wells has increased the potential consequences of an incident.  New scientific information is now available, most notably downhole gas well surveys that show that depth has a big effect on the possible deviation between a well’s surface location and its location at the coal seam level.  Click below to learn about best practices for development mining in the vicinity of gas wells.

Every year MSHA and state regulatory agencies evaluate approximately 1,000 requests to mine within 150 feet of oil and gas wells.  Historically, the primary technical document addressing interactions between gas wells and mining in the United States has been the “Pennsylvania Joint Oil and Gas Well Gas Well Pillar Study” published in 1957.  Much has changed in both the mining and gas industries since the guidelines were developed.  Today’s coal mines are hundreds of feet deeper than they were then, and the proliferation of high-pressure Marcellus and Utica gas wells has increased the potential consequences of an incident.  New scientific information is now available, most notably downhole gas well surveys that show that depth has a big effect on the possible deviation between a well’s surface location and its location at the coal seam level.

Well casing cut into by a continuous miner in an active coal mine.

Photo property of MSHA

Well casing cut into by a continuous miner in an active coal mine.

Key Safety Practices:

The setback distance from a well should be large enough to mitigate risks associated with the cumulative impact of the following four factors: 1) Well Deviation; 2) Surveying Error; 3) Mining Error; and 4) Pillar Rib Weathering and Peak Stress Avoidance Setback.

Well deviation is the horizontal distance between the surface location of the well and where it penetrates the coal seam.  Technical Support collected data from nearly 250 downhole well deviation surveys.  The data shows that as wells penetrate deeper, their deviation potential increases. When the cover (H) is less than 1,000 feet, no wells had deviations greater than H times the tangent of 2°. When H is greater than 1,000 feet, the maximum deviation was less than H times the tangent of 2.5°.

Surveying error can be calculated to determine the potential location error from the closure ratio. The survey error is independent of the depth of cover.

Mining error can occur due to mining off-sights due to inadequate survey control at the face, regardless of the depth of cover.  Frequently establishing sight spads and conducting check surveys mitigates risk associated with mining off-sights.

The Pillar Rib Weathering and Peak Stress Avoidance Setback addresses risks associated with a well penetrating the zone of the pillar where weathering of the rib or high pillar deformations (yield zone) occur.  This setback also should prevent the well from penetrating the pillar within the region where the peak pillar stress occur, and closer to the lower-stress, more stable core.

Resources:

Best Practices – Mining Near Oil and Gas Wells

Presentation – Mining Near Oil and Gas Wells

White Paper – Mining Near Oil and Gas Wells


McCraren Compliance offers many opportunities in safety training to help circumvent accidents. Please take a moment to visit our calendar of classes to see what we can do to help your safety measures from training to consulting.